Battlefield 3 Vs. Battlefield 4
I've been thinking this over and well i believe I've come to an conclusive answer on which game is better battlefield 4 or battlefield 3. And so without further ado i will share my thoughts... Starting with Battefield 4...
Battlefield 4 is a game made for like you'd expect for next gen console the ps4, xbox one and hardcore pc systems... so to some extent i haven't really tried this on them yet so im really just going by current gen ps3 and xbox 360 just to be able to give 3 a fair comparison... Battlefield 4 is a semi focused game that's flawed like any game built after the number 3... the games central focus to my understanding on make the campaign short and the online the best... Don't get me wrong the campaign is great i just felt they didnt truly give it an all out campaign the main issue i saw in the campaign was that the rate of death vs rate of progress was really a drag... I remember playing the campaign in a YouTube playthrough and found that id have to delete hours of dying because the game company pulled a skyrim on many missions... Saying that i mean they left huge gaps in save points so id die and have one hell of a time trying to retry the same enemies over again. The company should no better!!! Now on to battlefield 4's multiplayer details... Unlike what you'd expect from the last games the multiplayer has been really dulled down the vehicles now lost and jets make an hidden appearance.. Hell only two maps have jets in them!! So far and that makes the whole ideal behind what makes battlefield such a good game... so before i go on any further i need to talk about battlefield 3 and the goods and bads.
Battlefield 3... where to begin... Battlefield 3 is a heavy duty realistic first person shooter where they spent time on end making a realistic battlefield... The guns are truly simulated and for once in the history of games the M249 saw is able to really empty a clip! I now its a small detail but to me it just is better example... Call of duty when you run the clip down to empty the player is seen removing the belt still full! At that moment i am like well its call if duty they always do that! Well here are a few more, Far Cry games, borderlands (they have an excuse though), payday 2, and to my surprise battlefield 4! All i can is Electronic arts should know better! They also remove some other things that really ticked me off... Over the years batteries games have been slowly looking better but.getting worse at the same time... a little history in battefield bad company 1 and 2 the ingame engine allowed the player or players full damage ability by providing a unique geo environmental which in nerd terms is being able to blow the heck out of the entirement if your a fan of red faction or mercenaries its like that.. but when three came out they were forced to reduce this but for a battlefield veteran its barely notable BUT when 4 came out they pitched this for a timed destruction meaning you guessed it you can no longer blow shit up your not gonna be able to drive a tank into a building and watch it crumble... Heck its almost sad to say call of duty black ops 2 has a better geo envirement than BF4!! WTF EA? I also found that battlefield 3 had more time spent focused on the actual physics and making a game that's unlike anything before. So that's what its come to!? Well as I've made my points and kinda pitched out my thoughts i know i am fan of battlefield but really EA should have known.better its well unfortunately a flaw! Check out my channel on YouTube search AcidForgeGaming!
No comments:
Post a Comment